Garadget, the Indiegogo-funded maker of a ‘connected' garage door device that enables users to open and close it remotely from their smartphone, has been accused of deliberately cutting-off a customer following a negative review and "rudeness" in a posting on the company's online forum.
Garadget was crowd-funded to the tune of $62,865 via Indiegogo in February last year.
In the review on Amazon.com, the owner, Robert Martin of Tulsa, Oklahoma, described the device as "junk". He continued: "DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY. [The] iPhone app is a piece of junk, crashes constantly. [It's a] start-up company that obviously has not performed proper quality assurance tests on their products."
Just under one-quarter of the reviews on Amazon gave the product one or two stars, suggesting that Martin wasn't the only owner having problems with the product.
The user also posted his disgruntlement on the company's online forum.
"Just installed and attempting to register a door when the app started doing this. Have uninstalled and reinstalled iphone app, powered phone off/on - wondering what kind of piece of shit I just purchased here," he wrote on the company's forum.
At this point the company cut off his access to the system, preventing him from using the device he had purchased to open, close and check on the status of his garage door from his smartphone.
The company has since relented, but not before a storm of criticism in which the potential pitfalls of so-called Internet of Things (IoT) or connected devices were also highlighted.
"The fact that your lock, one day, will betray you, or your smoke detector won't sound, your pacemaker will pump differently or your car will make a different ethical decision because the company that sells it thinks that you're an asshole is beyond crazy," wrote one online commentator.
He continued: "If this isn't a wake-up call to anyone who doesn't realize how dangerous this DRM (Digital Rights My-ass) thing is becoming, I don't know what is. This is the can of shit that just can't wait to hit the fan for those who trust in those cloud-based proprietary ‘solutions'."
Another added: "The problem is: the industry's interest is to lock you in on their cloud so that you end up paying a recurring fee of some sort, while the public's interest is clearly to be as free as possible from the manufacturer once you have purchased from them..."
Others suggested that retailers like Amazon should more closely police IoT devices sold on their platforms in order to protect customers from potentially abusive companies.
Computing's Big Data and IoT Summit 2017 and the Big Data and IoT Summit Awards are coming on 17 May 2017.
Find out what construction giant Amey, Lloyds Banking Group, Financial Times and other big names are doing in big data and the Internet of Things.
Attendance to the Summit is free to qualifying senior IT professionals and IT leaders, but places are strictly limited, so apply now.
AND on the same day, Computing is also proud to present the Big Data and IoT Summit Awards, too. See the finalists - and secure a table for your team at the Awards - now:
And, yep, it'll run Android rather than RiscOS
US engineering giant's cost-cutting outsourcing plan is on the rocks, according to insiders
HP Envy X2 laptop only affordable if you've got loadsamoney
Counterfeit code-signing certificates enabling hackers to hide malware being sold by cyber criminals
Certificates can be used as part of layered obfuscation to evade detection by anti-virus software