Google has argued that UK privacy laws do not apply to the firm as it is a US-based company.
According to law firm Olswang, Google made the statement after Olswang brought a High Court case against the search giant. The claimants in the case, backed by Safari Users Against Google's Secret Tracking, argue that Google is bypassing the Apple iPhone's built-in security settings in order to monitor and collect users' personal information through the Safari browser.
At the time of publishing, Google had not responded to V3's request for comment on the accusations.
The case is similar to one filed with the US Federal Trade Commission, which ended with Google being fined $22.5m. Claimant Marc Bradshaw said the UK action is designed to make UK authorities take even sterner action against Google, arguing that fines alone will not work.
"It seems to us absurd to suggest that consumers can't bring a claim against a company which is operating in the UK and is even constructing a $1bn headquarters in London. If consumers can't bring a civil claim against a company in a country where it operates, the only way of ensuring it behaves is by having a robust regulator," Bradshaw said.
"Fines would be useless – even if Google agreed to pay them – because Google earns more than the maximum fine in less than two hours. With no restraint Google is free to continue to invade our privacy whether we like it or not."
Olswang partner Dan Tench said the law firm has already started working to make departments such as the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) take a more proactive and stern approach with Google.
"Our letter to the Information Commissioner conveyed our client's position that fines won't work and urged him to change Google's behaviour through an enforcement notice or other alternative sanctions. The response was that they found our client's position simplistic and difficult to implement," Tench said.
The case is one of many privacy complaints facing Google. In the US, rights group Consumer Watchdog launched a similar complaint against the firm. Last week, Google claimed Gmail users should not expect privacy in a court filing for the case.
Finger pointed at "advanced" nation state attacker in Norwegian health records cyber attack
Kaspersky claims the ban is based on subjective, non-technical public sources - and unconstitutional
Google unleashes Cloud AutoML tool to enable ordinary Joes to train AI systems without having to write code
Next step: machine learning systems that can generate their own machine learning software
Pixel devices could be hijacked by confusing the engine and escaping the Chrome sandbox