The US Department of Justice (DoJ) and US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) have released a joint statement calling for limited use of sales bans in standard essential patent-related court cases - a nod to the ongoing patent wars between the likes of Apple and Samsung.
In the statement the groups call on the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to only issue sales bans in extreme cases of infringement. The appeal for caution comes following a recent onslaught of patent infringement cases calling for sales bans.
In its statement the DoJ calls on the ITC to factor in the potential harm a sales ban could cause the public when working on patent cases. While the call does not completely rule out sales bans, it stresses caution when considering the issue.
The DoJ's statement comes following a recent onslaught of patent infringement cases in the smartphone market. Companies like Apple and Motorola have been seeking sales bans against competitors via patent infringement cases for the part few years.
Many of the cases involve standard essential patents, which cover technologies recognised as necessary for much of the industry to be able to utilise.
Companies that own standard essential patents usually license them to competitors for royalty fees. However, some firms have failed to agree licence fees on their patents and end up in court fighting for sales bans.
Much has been made about the US patent industry in recent months. Along with the DoJ, US Judge Richard Posner also decried the current uses of patents last July.
400 engineers have been working in secret on electric car project for the past two years, admits James Dyson
Russian Taiga smartphone promises snoop-proof communications - coming soon to employees of Russian state-owned firms
Eugene Kaspersky's ex outs smartphone that claims to prevent apps from spying on users
Deloitte accused of leaving its internal Active Directory server exposed to the internet with RDP open
Deloitte accused of lax systems administration and security practices over email hack
Lax systems administration practices blamed for exposing millions of sensitive client emails