Oracle may only win pocket change in its long-running Java battle with Android maker Google, after the latest ruling from the US judge presiding over the courtroom fight.
Earlier this week, the jury in the case ruled that Google had infringed Oracle's copyright over a few lines of code used in the development of Android.
But according to numerous reports, Judge William Alsup, who is hearing the case, said that the most Oracle may end with as a result of that infringement was statutory damages – which are limited to just $150,000.
Oracle had originally been seeking billions of dollars in damages from Google over the alleged abuse of Java code in the development of the Android mobile operating system.
The trial, which has already been running for nearly four weeks, was originally divided into three stages: the first examining copyright claims, the second patent claims and the third potential damages.
In the first state, the jury ruled that Google had breached copyright relating to a tiny proportion of Java code, but the inconclusive judgement on several key aspects led Google's lawyers to press for a mistrial.
Meanwhile, the judge has also suggested that the final stage of the trial should be curtailed.
“You ought to find a way to streamline the trial,” Judge Alsup is quoted in several reports as telling the two firms.
Leaks indicate that launch of AMD APUs with integrated Vega graphics is just around the corner
Facebook CISO Alex Stamos defends company over claims company network is 'run like a college campus'
Stamos explains: Facebook engineers enjoy a lot of autonomy, it's not disorganised and chaotic
HMRC refusal over VAT payment schedule forces 22-year-old computer reseller to the wall
AMD claims updates to Radeon ProRender will speed-up 3ds Max rendering by up to 35 per cent