Google chief executive, Larry Page, has claimed the firm's Android system is not "critical" to its success, although is an "important" part of its future, after being grilled by lawyers during the firm's legal battle with software giant Oracle.
The two firms are in court over whether or not Google used Oracle's Java technology within its Android operating system without obtaining the necessary licences, with Oracle seeking damages as high as $1bn.
According to reports, Page dismissed claims that Android was a critical part of the firm's future, as he was questioned by lawyer David Boies, who also cross examined Bill Gates in the 1990s during Microsoft's famous anti-trust lawsuit.
Page's claim that the system is not vital to the firm comes as Google prepares to part with $12.5bn for the purchase of Motorola, chiefly to take ownership of the firm's patent portfolio to help it fend off numerous patent lawsuits being levelled against the platform.
Under further questioning, from Google's own lawyers, Page admitted Google wanted to use the Java technology developed by Sun Microsystems, subsequently bought by Oracle, but had been forced to take other routes.
"It would have saved us a lot of time and trouble to use Sun's technology. When we weren't able to have our business partnership, we went down our own path," he said.
Page is likely to return to the courtroom to face further questioning as the trial continues.
On Tuesday Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison admitted he had mulled over the idea of the company launching its own smartphone as well as possibly acquiring another vendor such as Research in Motion or Palm.
Small Texas cable firm alleges foul play
Facebook will join fores with UK NGOs to tackle hate speech on the social network
A survey of local authorities has found that they face challenges in the areas of data, compliance and mobility.
More than 800,000 home users could be affected