After 2001, Intel's upcoming IA-64 chip architecture will split in two, with separate platforms for high end and low end machines.
This became clear as further details of the IA-64 roadmap leaked out this week, indicating Intel's plans until around 2003.
According to Gordon Graylish, Intel's marketing director for the Emea region, the IA-64 architecture will split after the introduction, in 2001, of the second generation of the 64-bit platform, codenamed McKinley.
The two planned processors are codenamed Madison (high end) and Deerfield (low end), and will both be manufactured in a 0.13 micron process.
Deerfield will be akin to an IA-64 implementation of the current 32-bit processor for consumer and budget PCs, Celeron. It will eventually supplant the IA-32 line of low end CPUs, although not before the current chips have been succeeded by at least four upgrades, the first three codenamed Tanner, Cascades and Foster.p> Graylish confirmed that Intel doesn't want people to get too excited about IA-64 too soon. Its plans for the continuation of IA-32 make it clear that it anticipates this being the volume platform for some time.
The Foster processor, which will be a contemporary of Merced, will offer "outstanding performance for 32-bit volume apps". Said Graylish: "We think we've got the timeline about right. There's not much requirement for 64-bit today, but in five years' time there will be."
Asked why, in that case, people should even bother about 64-bit before McKinley, Graylish pointed out that the lead times in server and application deployment meant it was important for corporations to use Merced initially. A 12-18 month enterprise deployment cycle would then have them poised for the arrival of McKinley.
Dr Kuan Hon criticises GDPR consent emails that will only eviscerate marketing databases and 'media misinformation'
Apple squashes Steam Link app on 'business conflicts' grounds
Philip Hammond wants to forget rules that the UK agreed with the EU to ban non-European companies from the satellites
Instapaper to 'go dark' in Europe until it can work out GDPR compliance