Digital is attempting to persuade the US authorities to start an antitrust case against Intel, according to the 'New York Times'.
The senior legal counsel at Digital, Thomas Siekman, wrote to his counterpart at Intel and, according to the newspaper, has asked the Justice Department to open an enquiry because the chip giant is under an obligation to tell Digital about its future products.
But the move may conceal fear at Digital that Intel will refuse to supply it with processors after its current order book expires in the third quarter, according to Joe D?Elia, senior analyst at Dataquest UK.
He said: ?It?s taken Digital a long time to come to this conclusion so one wonders what the motivation is behind it. Intel has had 80 per cent of this market for a huge number of years.?
According to D?Elia, Digital?s PC business would not be able to survive using clone chips supplied by AMD or Cyrix. ?They can?t use what are essentially desktop products in notebooks or servers so a refusal by Intel to supply processors will impact them severely,? he said.
He said that Intel does not have to supply chips to Digital. ?It (Digital) must be trying to protect its source of supply for PCs,? he said.
Four years ago, the Department of Justice dropped a previous antitrust investigation into Intel. It refused to comment on whether it would act this time.
Cotton seedling freezes to death as Chang'e-4 shuts down for the Moon's 14-day lunar night
Fortnite easily out-earns PUBG, Assassin's Creed Odyssey and Red Dead Redemption 2 in 2018
Meteor showers as a service will be visible for about 100 kilometres in all directions
Saturn's rings only formed in the past 100 million years, suggests analysis of Cassini space probe data
New findings contradict conventional belief that Saturn's rings were formed along with the planet about 4.5 billion years ago