Many software developers intentionally create "unnecessarily complex products " to show off their engineering talents, new research claims.
A Management Insights feature in the current issue of Management Science suggests that software authors have a "perverse incentive" to choose more difficult designs over simple architectures as doing so will further their careers.
The report, written by Enno Siemsen of the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, noted that companies are struggling to cope with increasingly difficult and complex product design projects.
Siemsen asserts that good designers have an incentive to choose more difficult designs to better prove their talent, while less capable designers have an incentive to choose highly difficult designs to obfuscate their lack of talent.
One way to reduce these dysfunctional incentives, Siemsen argues, is to move reward agreements away from a long-term, career-oriented focus towards a short-term focus in which bonuses are directly linked to the success or failure of projects.
Alternative ways to reduce these incentives are to collect better data on design task outcomes, or evaluations from managers who have an interest in the design projects succeeding and an excellent understanding of the technology.
- Enno Siemsen Report: The Hidden Perils of Career Concerns in R&D Organizations
Cotton seedling freezes to death as Chang'e-4 shuts down for the Moon's 14-day lunar night
Fortnite easily out-earns PUBG, Assassin's Creed Odyssey and Red Dead Redemption 2 in 2018
Meteor showers as a service will be visible for about 100 kilometres in all directions
Saturn's rings only formed in the past 100 million years, suggests analysis of Cassini space probe data
New findings contradict conventional belief that Saturn's rings were formed along with the planet about 4.5 billion years ago