The decision not to proceed with the complaint against St Albans-based Peter John Lashmar goes against the advice of its own reviewer of complaints, angering the alleged victim, IT specialist David Shaw. The independent reviewer considers disciplinary decisions made by the institute when a complainant is unhappy about action not being taken. However, the institute is not obliged to follow the advice of the reviewer, who in this case recommended the institute reconsider. Shaw blasted the 'lame' responses of the institute, adding: 'How can a public and so-called professional body allow such unprofessional behaviour to continue.' He added: 'This is a prima facie example of why self-regulation should be stamped out.' The former partners fell out in 1996. Lashmar allegedly began a campaign of harassment by filling out requests for information in newspapers resulting in Shaw being deluged by mail and phone calls. Lashmar also submitted a false claim for an alleged debt, for which the institute fined him £2,000. The institute said it decided not to proceed against Lashmar over the harassment as its handwriting expert expressed the view that it was only 'probable' that Lashmar had filled in the newspaper coupons.
Some parts of Atacama have not received rainfall for 500 years - but a sudden deluge of water upset the Desert's delicate biological balance
Spitzer Space Telescope could not spot Oumuamua, suggesting that it is actually pretty small
Greenland crater one of the 25 largest impact craters on Earth
This long-sought progenitor star was identified in an image captured by Hubble in 2007