The fallout from Monday's vnunet story about Microsoft's latest threat against Red Hat Linux users was quite predictable. Most dismissed it as just another FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) attack. Rightfully so, it seems.
"People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation to compensate us. There are plenty of other people who have also intellectual property. Every time an Eolas comes to Microsoft and says: 'Pay us,' I expect they eventually would like to go to the open source world. Getting an intellectual property interoperability framework between the two worlds I think is important."
The talking points aren't new, but Ballmer this time made the capital mistake of making a concrete threat against Red Hat. Previously he would targeted Linux or open source in general.
Warming was most pronounced in Siberia region
The tank will be subjected to high stresses and loads via dozens of hydraulic cylinders during testing
'Sunlit wet sidewalk' provides evidence of methane rainfall on the north pole of Saturn's moon Titan
Methane rainfall indicates the start of the summer season in Titan's northern hemisphere
Scientists believe there could be other hydrides or superhydrides with super conducting properties