Sneak was delighted to learn that denial of service attacks on email systems are not legal after all. As you may recall, a judge late last year opined that sending millions of messages to a company with the intention of causing IT difficulties was not a crime, as the mail servers were simply being put to the use for which they were provided. Sneak refrained from attempting to deliver a brown-paper-wrapped Transit van through the judge’s letterbox, and instead waited for the appeal. Fortunately for Sneak’s no-claims bonus, the Court of Appeals has ruled that while a computer owner might consent to receiving emails, the consent would not cover messages sent with the intention of disrupting the system.
Sneak wonders if the ruling can be extended to cover the myriad unwelcome firms who, taken together, mount a round-the-clock denial-of-paper attack on Sneak’s fax machine?
And, yep, it'll run Android rather than RiscOS
US engineering giant's cost-cutting outsourcing plan is on the rocks, according to insiders
HP Envy X2 laptop only affordable if you've got loadsamoney
Counterfeit code-signing certificates enabling hackers to hide malware being sold by cyber criminals
Certificates can be used as part of layered obfuscation to evade detection by anti-virus software