Intel has officially launched its first
Nehalem-based
Xeon chips for servers and workstations, bringing increased performance and
greater power efficiency in the biggest overhaul of the Xeon platform for years.
The first wave of the new chips consists of the Xeon 5500 series for
dual-socket systems, and the Xeon 3500 targeting single-socket systems,
collectively known as Nehalem EP (Efficient Performance).
Nehalem processors for desktops were launched last year under the
Core
i7 brand, while the Nehalem EX for servers with four or more sockets is
expected later this year.
Intel said that the increased performance of the new platform will enable
firms to replace up to nine older servers with a single Nehalem-based system,
making a strong case for purchasing new kit despite the current economic
climate.
"We reckon customers can get a 9-to-1 consolidation ratio by replacing
existing servers with Nehalem. There will be a capital expenditure hit to
swallow, but after that there's a lot of justification for why customers should
look at this now," said Intel's enterprise marketing manager Alan Priestley.
Gordon Haff, principal IT advisor at analyst firm
Illuminata,
said that it is easy for vendors to make impressive comparisons with older
generations of kit, but gave a cautious welcome to the announcement.
"Nehalem is a very nice upgrade for Intel in the two-socket space. It has
great performance, and great performance per watt. You can see this in the
amount of activity the system vendors are planning around this launch," he said.
Dell announced
Nehalem
products last week as part of its new enterprise line-up, while
Cisco's
Unified Computing System is based on Nehalem servers.
Lenovo
unveiled new Nehalem workstations last week, while HP and Sun are also
expected to introduce Nehalam systems shortly.
In addition to offering higher performance, Nehalem systems will consume up
to 20 per cent less energy which, combined with the need for fewer servers,
leads to reduced operating expenditure, Intel said.
"Customers should see payback on any refresh within eight months," said
Priestley.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article