A
Chinese
hacking plot uncovered at the weekend could have grave implications for
organisations, as most are vulnerable to the social malware techniques used in
the attack, a new report warns.
The
Snooping
Dragon report (PDF) was written by Shishir Nagaraja from the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Cambridge University's Ross Anderson.
The report focuses specifically on the hacking of PCs at various branches of
the Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, and goes further than research into
the
GhostNet
network revealed by Canadian researchers in explicitly blaming the Chinese
government.
A combination of "well-written malware with well-designed email lures" was
used by the Chinese government to collect actionable insight for its police and
security services, the report states.
"The modus operandi combined social phishing with high-grade malware," the
report said. "Few organisations outside the defence and intelligence sector
could withstand such an attack and, although this particular case involved the
agents of a major power, the attack could in fact have been mounted by a capable
motivated individual."
The hackers apparently monitored discussion forums frequented by Dalai monks,
and used the information to create convincing phishing emails complete with
attachments that downloaded key-loggers to PCs at the Dalai Lama's offices.
"We assume that one monk clicked on an infected attachment, giving the
attackers their first foothold," the report said.
The researchers have now warned that companies keeping sensitive information
on networked computers "had better think long and hard", although they recognise
that separating internet-connected PCs and devices which store sensitive data is
not practical.
"What Chinese spooks did in 2008, Russian crooks will do in 2010, and even
low-budget criminals from less developed countries will follow in due course,"
the report warned.
"In the medium term we predict that social malware will be used for fraud,
and the typical company has really no defence against it. We expect that many
crooks will get rich before effective countermeasures are widely deployed."
Rick Howard, director of security intelligence at managed security provider
iDefense,
explained that nearly all of his customers had reported attacks using common
email attachments.
"But there is hope. With the correct intelligence and security programmes,
these organisations can reduce the amount of risk, so that even if an enemy was
successful at breaching the perimeter, the amount of damage to the network or
the amount of information leaked would not be devastating," he said.
"The bottom line is that the organisational leadership must understand their
risk model and take measures to protect the high danger – high impact risks.
This can be done and is being done by well run organizations with a good
security programs."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article