Intel is to
invest $7bn (£4.7bn) over the next two years to bring 32nm chips to market, the
company has revealed. The first such processors are now expected to go into
production later this year, with additional products following in 2010.
The first 32nm processors are codenamed Westmere and will be a die-shrink of
the current Nehalem architecture, but with graphics capabilities integrated with
the processor. The initial chips will target mainstream mobile and desktop
systems, and were demonstrated by Intel at an event in San Francisco today.
Stephen Smith, vice president of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, detailed
the firm's roadmap to 32nm processors, saying that it will first deliver new
45nm quad-core Nehalem chips codenamed Lynnfield and Clarksfield that target
mainstream desktop and thin-and-light laptops respectively.
These will be followed by 32nm processors called Clarkdale and Arrandale,
similarly aimed at desktops and laptops, but these initial Westmere chips will
have two cores and integrated graphics functions.
"The smaller production process will enable us to reduce the core size while
still delivering two threads per core, and with graphics integrated into the
processor," said Smith.
Westmere will eventually scale to a six-core/12-thread client processor
called Gulftown, he added, as well as platforms for servers.
Intel also said that its 32nm process will be split into two versions, one
optimised for mainstream chips and one for system-on-a-chip (SoC) processors
aimed at netbooks and other mobile devices.
Mark Bohr, Intel senior fellow for logic development, explained that this is
because mainstream chips call for fast-switching transistors, while SoCs require
low leakage current to optimise power efficiency.
The graphics inside the Westmere processors will be based on the current
graphics functions integrated into Intel's current 4-series motherboard
chipsets, but provide "a significant boost in performance", according to Smith.
Oddly, the graphics and memory controller circuits are on a separate 45nm
silicon die from the 32nm processor, at least in the first products, although
they will be mounted together inside the same chip package.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article