The security industry needs to reprioritise its response to disclosed
software vulnerabilities in order to determine more effectively when emergency
patching is most needed, according to the latest annual security trends report
from IBM.
The
2008
X-Force Trends and Risk report found that a number of critical
vulnerabilities disclosed in 2008 did not actually see widespread exploitation
in the field.
IBM argues that the current
Common
Vulnerability Scoring System focuses on the technical aspects of a
vulnerability, such as severity and ease of exploitation, and does not
acknowledge that the main motivation for online criminals today is economic.
"We realise that cyber criminals are motivated by money, and we need to fully
consider how attackers balance the economic opportunity of a vulnerability
against the costs of exploitation," said Kris Lamb, senior operations manager of
X-Force research and development for IBM Internet Security Systems.
"If the security industry can better understand the motivations of computer
criminals we can be more precise about determining when widespread exploitation
of a vulnerability will take a long time to emerge, and when it is unlikely to
ever emerge. This analysis could result in more efficient use of time and
resources."
The report also found a 13.5 per cent increase in newly discovered
vulnerabilities last year compared to 2007, and that 53 per cent of all
vulnerabilities disclosed during 2008 ended the year with no vendor patches
issued.
In related news, a new wave of botnet activity has driven up spam volumes to
the same levels they were before the
McColo
shutdown, according to new figures from managed security service provider
MessageLabs.
"With botnets now responsible for as much as 80 per cent of all spam, the
likelihood is that the increase in spam volumes in the last few days can be
attributed to a new wave of activity from the Mega-D and Xarvester [botnets],"
said Paul Wood, MessageLabs intelligence analyst at Symantec.
"As the botnet community becomes even more crowded, 2009 could be the year
when spam levels reach an all-time high."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article