Dutch search firm
Ixquick
has announced that it has stopped recording IP addresses in a bid to boost user
privacy.
Issues surrounding the protection of personal information were once again
brought to the fore during yesterday's
second
annual Data Privacy Day.
With a deluge of data breaches reported last year, along with warnings that
vital personal information is becoming easily available on social networks,
online privacy has come under the microscope like never before.
Industry giants such as Google and Microsoft have come under scrutiny from
various sides regarding their policies around the
anonymisation
of search log data, while the UK government has been slammed for its
plans
to record electronic communications.
Under pressure from European regulators and privacy organisations, and rising
public concern, the major search engines have offered to lower their data
retention times to between three and 18 months.
Many search engines routinely record searches and their associated IP
addresses in order to generate behavioural profiles, which can help return more
accurate search results and provide more targeted advertising.
Ixquick explained that it used to delete the privacy details of its users
within 48 hours, but that IP addresses will now not be recorded at all.
"At Ixquick we feel people have a fundamental right to privacy," said chief
executive Robert Beens. "Using a search engine is sharing your innermost secrets
and habits, which should be safe."
Ixquick also offers a secure connection over the https protocol to help
ensure even greater privacy for its users, and is developing a proxy service to
allow people to browse the web in full anonymity, which should be available in
the next few months.
"With privacy, the devil is in the detail. These engines use log-ins and
unique ID cookies that are automatically placed on your computer when you
search," added Beens.
"Both techniques can 'glue' your searches together far beyond the officially
claimed retention periods. That's why Ixquick doesn't use either of these
methods."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article