OQO has updated its iconic ultra-mobile PC (UMPC) design with an Intel Atom
processor and the first PC organic light emitting diode (Oled) display.
Unveiled at the
Consumer
Electronics Show in Las Vegas, the
OQO
model 2+ looks very similar to the previous 02 and
model
e2 devices. Internally, however, the device boasts a beefed-up specification
based on Intel's Atom processor and 2GB of memory.
The move to Atom boosts performance considerably compared with earlier models
based on VIA or Transmeta chips, according to OQO director of international
channels Martin Day.
"We've found much higher performance with the Atom - up to twice the
execution speed," he said.
The battery life in the new model is improved by about 20 per cent, offering
up to 3.5 hours with the standard battery pack, Day said. An extended battery
offers double the capacity.
OQO also claims the model 2+ as the first PC to integrate an active-matrix
Oled display, offering more vivid colours and a very wide viewing angle.
Day said that the screen has to be seen to be believed. "The viewing angle is
180 degrees. You can twist the system round and you can still read the display
until the case blocks your view," he claimed.
The other new feature of the model 2+ is a wireless modem based on Qualcomm's
Gobi global mobile internet chipset, which supports the EV-DO and HSPA 3G
cellular standards used in the US and Europe respectively.
In format, the model 2+ is similar to its predecessors with a 5in display and
a slide-down Qwerty keyboard. Unlike the more recent netbook phenomenon, the OQO
is designed to be used while cradled in the owner's hands and weighs about
454g.
The new model is available with 1.86GHz or 1.33GHz Atom processors and runs
Windows Vista Business edition, XP Professional or XP Home. Hard drive options
are available up to 120GB or a Flash SSD up to 60GB.
OQO said the model 2+ will be available in the first half of 2009 with
pricing starting at $999 in the US. UK pricing will be a straight currency
conversion, according to Day, which equates to about £656 using the rate
available at time of publication.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article