Whitehall
Government sometimes acts as if it owns citizens' personal data

Government needs better IT checks

Who watches the watchers, asks Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones

Ian Williams

The government needs to subject itself to the same checks and balances it is imposing on private business if it is to ensure data is not abused and public trust is restored, according to the shadow security minister Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones.

Speaking at the RSA security conference in London, Neville-Jones stressed that greater oversight was needed in the face of government powers that often exceed their intended purpose.

Advertisement

Expressing concern over potential plans for a massive centralised database, she warned that such a massive system would be much harder and costlier to manage, more vulnerable to abuse and misuse, and open to greater levels of inaccuracy.

She said it was "time to address the lax security, as well as the lack of uniformity, standards and rigours that should be in place when dealing with this type of information".

"A clean-up job needs to be done," said Neville-Jones.

"For too long the government has been treating the information about us in its possession as its own, rather then remembering it still belongs to us."

She stressed that while it is important for the authorities to have access to the data they need to effectively do their job and protect society, it is equally important to make sure that the proper procedures are in place to avoid the abuse and loss of that data.

"In public office sometimes it can be easy to forget who is the servant," she said.

"The government must be subordinate to the rule of law, not above it."

During her keynote speech, Neville-Jones applauded the government's decision to hold an informed debate regarding the creation of large centralised databases, but added that it would only be effective if stakeholders took the time to make sure they understood the issues fully.

She concluded that ultimately it is a question of balance, but that if implemented correctly we could reach a system in which "privacy and liberty are compatible with security".

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Do you agree?

Further reading

Richard Thomas

Privacy tzar speaks out against data breach notification laws

But Information Commissioner admits breach levels remain worrying

Search engines

Net's biggest names push for free speech

Google, Microsoft, Yahoo hop on board anti-censorship campaign

European data breach laws could land in 2011

European data protection supervisor backs call for law to apply to all information service providers

Gartner urges government investment in Web 2.0

Analyst firm stresses importance of social networking

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation