An analysis into the use of financial malware has shown that despite a fall
in the number of new attacks detected, criminals are still managing to beat
security measures designed to stop fraud.
The study found that while discoveries of malware aimed at banks and other
financial groups appears to be decreasing, this does not indicate a reduced
threat. Rather the threats are increasing as malware writers are getting
smarter.
Advertisement
“Financial institutions around the world are seeing increasing losses from
cybercrime,” wrote Roel Schouwenberg, senior anti-virus researcher at
Kaspersky
Lab.
“Investing in better security costs a lot of money. However, this is a choice
that banks clearly have to make.”
Attack vectors have changed significantly in the last year, according to
Kaspersky, with far less reliance on easily blocked spam containing malware to
attack code being embedded in web pages.
This is in line with other software attacks, but what differentiated the
malware for finance houses is its sophistication. Traditional keylogging
software is now being replaced by Trojans, that can download ever more complex
spying tools.
For example, two-factor authentication for online banking, which uses a
hardware token in addition to a secret password, is increasingly ineffective.
This is because malware writers have perfected the tools to get around it by
redirecting the user to a separate server to harvest the necessary access
information in real time – the so called ‘man in the middle’ attack.
This defeats the two-factor process, but malware writers have taken the
process a step further with a new ‘man in the endpoint’ attack. This eliminates
the need for a separate server by conducting the entire attack on the user’s
machine.
“There are several significant advantages to this approach,” Schouwenberg
said.
“First, there is a direct connection with the financial organisation so
there is no chance of a transaction being tagged simply because a user has
logged on from an unknown IP address. Second, a man in the endpoint attack will
have a better success rate than a man in the middle one if used against a system
which employs complex defences.”
The situation is being aided by the increasing use of ‘money mules’, people
who are recruited to act as recipients of stolen funds and pass them on in the
form of e-gold or moneygram certificates to the fraudster in exchange for a 10
to 15 per cent cut.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article