UK privacy watchdog, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), has
declared that Google's Streetview service won't break any privacy laws when it
begins operation in the UK.
Streetview is a feature of Google Earth and Maps that provides 360 degree
street-level photographic views with navigation overlays. The service was
launched in the US in May 2007 and is now available for numerous US cities and
in Australia, Japan, France and Italy.
Advertisement
Vehicles fitted with laser scanners used to collect the images have been
spotted in London, Liverpool and Dundee.
Privacy lobby groups have expressed concern that the service constitutes an
invasion of personal privacy: when the images are collected they include people
who are in the vicinity at the time.
Indeed in April this year, Aaron and Christine Boring of Pittsburgh sued
Google for $25,000 in damages and asked the court to order Google to destroy
the images that showed their house.
But the ICO says that in the course of its discussions with Google over the
introduction of the service to the UK, the search giant has satisfied the
Commissioner that it won't violate the rights of individuals.
Google began blurring out the faces of individuals, car registrations and the
location of domestic violence shelters from May 2008 and has made provision for
anyone to object to an image and have it removed.
"We are satisfied that Google is putting in place adequate safeguards to
avoid any risk to the privacy or safety of individuals, including the blurring
of vehicle registration marks and the faces of anyone included in Streetview
images," said the ICO in a prepared statement.
"Although it is possible that in certain limited circumstances an image may
allow the identification of an individual, it is clear that Google is keen to
capture images of streets and not individuals. Further, there is an easy
mechanism by which individuals can report an image that causes them concern to
Google and request that it is removed.
"Images are not real time and there is a delay between taking an image and
its publication so that it could not be used to make decisions about an
individual's current whereabouts."
Data privacy lawyers in the UK have said that unless an individual can be
identified from the images, the service does not contravene UK Data Protection
Act.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article