Security researchers should stop publishing vulnerabilities in the
traditional way because cyber-criminals are using the code to generate zero-day
exploits at record speeds, says a recent report.
The mid-year
Trend
Statistics report from IBM's X-Force team shows that cyber-criminals are
using automated software tools to launch zero-day exploits more quickly than
ever before.
The report claimed that 94 per cent of all browser-related online exploits
occurred within 24 hours of official vulnerability disclosure.
The practice of disclosing exploit code along with a security advisory is
accepted practice for many security researchers.
However, according to the X-Force report, vulnerabilities disclosed by
independent researchers are twice as likely to have zero-day exploit code
published.
IBM believes that this calls into question how researchers practise
vulnerability disclosure, and highlights a need for a new standard in the
industry.
"The two major themes in the first half of 2008 were acceleration and
proliferation," said X-Force operations manager Kris Lamb.
"We see a considerable acceleration in the time a vulnerability is disclosed
to when it is exploited, with an accompanying proliferation of vulnerabilities
overall."
Lamb warned that, without a unified process for disclosing vulnerabilities,
the research industry runs the risk of actually fuelling online criminal
activity.
"There is a reason why X-Force does not publish exploit code for the
vulnerabilities we have found, and perhaps it is time for others in our field to
reconsider this practice," he said.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article