A high-profile security flaw scheduled for disclosure next month has been
released early, much to the chagrin of security experts.
Researcher Dan Kaminsky had originally planned to disclose details about the
vulnerability at next month's Black Hat conference in Las Vegas.
The vulnerability lies in the basic components of the Domain Name System and
could allow a hacker to use a 'cache poisoning' attack to redirect traffic
without the user's knowledge.
Kaminsky said that, although he had known about the vulnerability for months,
he had not publicly released any details to allow vendors time to patch the flaw
and prevent the attack.
Vendors had responded well to the policy, coordinating a
major
patch release earlier this month. By last week, reports surfaced that a
number of ISPs had either already patched the flaw or were in the process of
doing so.
Yesterday, however, the grace period ended when a self-proclaimed DNS novice
blew the gaff. Reverse engineering specialist Halvar Flake posted a theory which
turned out to be Kaminsky's DNS flaw.
Researchers are now urging administrators who have not patched the flaw to
install updates as soon as possible.
"Since this now means the bad guys have access to it at will, the urgency of
patching your recursive DNS servers just increased significantly," said Sans
researcher Swa Frantzen.
A posting on Kaminsky's blog said: "Patch. Today. Now. Yes, stay late." The
US Computer Emergency Readiness Team has posted a
set
of guidelines for mitigating the flaw on unpatched servers.
The disclosure of the vulnerability was not exactly intentional. Flake was
reading through a basic DNS text in his spare time and posted a blog on Monday
speculating on the possible flaw.
"I have done pretty much no protocol work in my life, so I have little hope
for having gotten close to the truth," he wrote.
As it turns out, Flake's speculation was right on. Security firm Matasano
briefly posted a blog entry confirming Flake's hypothesis. Shortly after, the
posting was removed and the company issued an apology for the confirmation.
"Dan told me about his finding personally in order to help ensure widespread
patching before further details were announced at the upcoming Black Hat
conference," wrote Matasano principal Thomas Ptacek.
"That I helped detract from that work is painful both personally and
professionally, and I apologize to Dan for the way this played out."
Flake, however, issued no such apologies. The researcher noted that the
information embargo assumed that malware writers would not discover and exploit
the flaw before the Black Hat conference.
"I respect Dan Kaminsky's viewpoint, but I disagree that this buys anyone
time," Flake wrote.
"If nobody speculates publicly, we are pulling the wool over the eyes of the
general public and ourselves. We are not buying anybody time; we are buying
people a warm and fuzzy feeling."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article