A House of Lords committee has called on the government to make banks, not
customers, legally liable for internet fraud.
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee called for legislation to
force banks to cover customer losses incurred through e-crimes in its follow-up
report into personal internet security published in August 2007.
Advertisement
The report claims that, under the current system, banks often deny liability
for password and Pin fraud, claiming customer negligence or even complicity in
the fraud.
"We reiterate our strongly held view that the current reporting sequence is
wholly unsatisfactory and that it risks undermining public trust in the police
and the internet," says the report.
The committee also recommended that victims of cyber-crime should be able to
report incidents directly to the police, reversing the current process which
requires them to report incidents to their bank.
The peers also called for a data breach notification law that would require
organisations publicly to acknowledge breaches when customer security has been
compromised.
We reiterate our strongly held view that the current reporting sequence is wholly unsatisfactory
House of Lords committee
The report acknowledged recent proactive moves in terms of protecting UK
citizens from online crime, following the government's embarrassing data
breaches.
"A level of indifference on the part of the government has now been dispelled
only as a result of recent incidents involving serious losses of personal data,
" the report said.
The call was backed by Bill Beverley, security technology sales manager at F5
Networks.
"If people were to adopt best practices, many of these data breaches would
not have occurred," he told
vnunet.com.
Beverley believes that this move would "add some teeth to the legislation"
and help spur complacent companies into action when it comes to the protection
of data and the liabilities involved when breaches occur.
He added that it is imperative that government agencies are held to the same
standards at private companies.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article