Chemists at Stanford University have developed a new way to make transistors
out of carbon nano-ribbons, which could be used to make cooler and faster
computer chips.
The researchers, led by chemistry professor Hongjie Dai, have made a
field-effect transistor with graphene that can operate at room temperature.
Field-effect transistors are widely used in computer components and act as
data carriers from one place to another within a circuit.
Unlike a traditional transistor, in the presence of an electric field a
charged metal plate can draw positive and negative charges in and out of the
semiconductor.
This allows the current to pass through or be blocked, which in turn controls
how the devices can be switched on and off thereby regulating the flow of data.
Previous graphene transistors have been made with wider nano-ribbons or thin
films of graphene, but require much lower temperatures to operate.
Professor Dai's group succeeded in making graphene nano-ribbons fewer than 10
nanometres wide, which allows them to operate at higher temperatures.
"For graphene transistors, previous demonstrations of field-effect
transistors were all done at liquid helium temperature, which is 4 Kelvin [-452
Fahrenheit]," he said.
"People had not been able to make graphene nano-ribbons narrow enough to
allow the transistors to work at higher temperatures until now."
Although several researchers have shown that carbon nanotubes significantly
outperform silicon, not all of the tubes are semiconducting.
"Depending on their structure, some carbon nanotubes are born metallic, and
some are born semiconducting," explained Professor Dai.
"Metallic nanotubes can never switch off and act like electrical shorts for
the device, which is a problem."
However, the narrow graphene nano-ribbons created by Professor Dai's novel
chemical technique are always semiconductors.
"This is why structure at the atomic scale, in this case width and edges,
matters," he said.
As chip makers begin to encounter problems with the further shrinking of
silicon-based components, some are considering graphene as a possible
alternative.
But Professor Dai is quick to point out that, although it could be a useful
material for future electronics, it will not replace silicon any time soon.
The work is described in a paper published in the 23 May issue of
Physical Review Letters.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article