The cost of implementing ID cards in the UK has risen by 37 per cent in the
past six months, but the government claims that it is reducing overall costs.
Outsourcing biometric collection data, and cutting other costs, can reduce
the overall cost of the system from £5.43bn to £4.57bn, according to the
Identity Cards Scheme Cost Report May 2008.
"In order to enrol fingerprint and photograph biometrics in the most
convenient and cost-effective way, we now plan to provide this through the open
market," the report said. "This will result in a cost reduction."
The move will mean that government passport offices will no longer collect
biometrics and that private contractors will bid to do the job instead. The
report does not say what will happen in areas where no private bid is made.
Phil Booth, national coordinator at campaign group NO2ID, said: "We are used
to the Home Office's blatant creative accounting, but this is staggering. It now
appears to have junked the primary pretext for the scheme. So what is it for?
"Ministers repeatedly asserted that ID registration would involve checking
everyone individually and taking their fingerprints.
"Dropping interrogations and fingerprinting for all may knock £1bn off the
latest fantasy figures, but it scraps even this fairy-tale notion of security.
They are rushing round and round in circles. It is a farce."
A committee of academics from the LSE
examined
the proposed ID card plans three years ago and found they would cost four
times the government's estimates. The cards would cost
over
£300 each if the full cost was passed on.
Papers released with the government report paint a grim picture of the
overall state of the project.
A report by the government-appointed Independent Scheme Assurance Panel,
comprising senior information managers from organisations like Nokia and
Cranfield University, suggests that the scheme is in dire straits.
The Panel concluded that the scheme still lacks a "robust and transparent
operational data governance regime and clear data architecture".
In addition they express fears of unauthorised accessing of data by staff,
following the revelation that
over
600 HM Revenue & Customs staff had been disciplined for precisely this
offence.
"No specification, no departmental buy-in, no rationale for key design
decisions and no ministerial control. This is official confirmation that the
Identity and Passport Service is a runaway train," said Booth.
"As we pointed out back in January, Gordon Brown should pay attention to the
detail. Ministers are rubber-stamping a consultant-driven scheme of epic
proportions."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article