Orange
Orange's free text offer was subject to a fair usage policy of 3,000 texts per month

Orange let off the hook over Rainbow ad

'Unlimited' does not have to mean 'unlimited', says ASA

Ian Williams

Orange has been let off the hook after the Advertising Standards Authority received five complaints about an ad campaign offering unlimited free texts on its pay-as-you-go system.

The ad opens with a man on a roof unfurling a rainbow flag. The 'rainbow' continues in a variety of formats, including a line drawn along a wall covered in sheets of paper and a large rainbow-coloured cloth fired from a home-made cannon.

Advertisement

During the ad a voiceover said: 'It's great when good things never end', followed by 'That's why at Orange we now offer unlimited free texts on Orange Pay As You Go, to any network, at any time. So you can keep on texting as long as you want.'

Accompanying press and poster ads carried the same claim. All the ads specified that 'terms applied', including a fair usage policy, a required £30 top up and that the offer was for UK texts only.

The complainants all challenged whether the 'unlimited' claim was misleading, because they believed the offer was subject to a fair usage policy of 3,000 texts per month or because customers had to top-up with £30 each month to receive the free texts.

Orange responded by saying that its unlimited free text offer was subject to a fair usage policy of 3,000 texts per month, which it mentioned in all the ads.

Furthermore, Orange argued that it did not charge customers that went over that limit, or stop them from sending texts, but that it did reserve the right to review excessive usage.

If a customer regularly went over the fair usage policy it asked that customer to reduce their usage and could move them onto a different tariff which did not have unlimited texts.

The fine print included in all points of the ad campaign, combined with Orange's explanation was enough to placate the ASA which dismissed the claimants' concerns.

"On this point we investigated the TV ad under CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code rules 5.1 (Misleading advertising), 5.2.1 (Evidence) and 5.2.3 (Qualifications) but did not find it in breach," said the ASA in its ruling.

"Overall, the ASA investigated Orange under CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 5.1 (Misleading advertising), 5.2.1 (Evidence), 5.2.3 (Qualifications), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 32.1 and 32.4 (Free offers and free trials) but in all cases did not find it in breach of regulations."

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation