BSkyB chairman James Murdoch has attacked the BBC iPlayer service, accusing
the BBC's governing body of an "abrogation of responsibility".
Murdoch's comments after delivering the Marketing Society annual lecture in
London mark the latest stage in the ongoing battle between Sky and the BBC.
IPlayer represented a "big step", according to Murdoch, and a "pre-emptive
intervention in a marketplace [which is] otherwise hugely competitive and moving
very fast".
Murdoch reserved his criticisms for the manner in which the BBC is regulated
and the way the service was brought to market, rather than the iPlayer itself.
"I am not saying it is a bad product, but it does crowd out competition and
innovation. But we have it now, so there you are," he said. "It is less about
the iPlayer and more the process that led to its birth."
The success of the iPlayer has even taken the BBC by surprise. The service
handled 17.5 million requests for downloads in April, less than three months
after its launch.
TV executives are concerned that the iPlayer will make further inroads into
pay TV, as the BBC has pledged around £130m for investment in on-demand services
over the next five years.
The BBC Trust countered Murdoch's criticisms, pointing out that the iPlayer
had been subject to a rigorous Pubic Value Test which included a market impact
assessment carried out by Ofcom.
"The Trust imposed a number of conditions on the iPlayer to take account of
market impact issues, consultation responses from the industry, and responses
from 10,000 licence fee payers before final approval was given," said a BBC
Trust spokeswoman.
The BBC has also come under fire from ISPs since the launch of iPlayer,
leading to calls for so-called
traffic
shaping where control is exerted over the number of users visiting a network
at any one time.
Service providers have even suggested that the BBC should pay a
congestion
charge, citing Ofcom estimates that the cost of upgrading infrastructure to
cope with increased traffic levels could amount to £830m by 2011.
The regulator has, however,
ruled
out public funds being allocated to network upgrades.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article