Google
is offering security professionals a look into its security systems.
Scott Petry, director of Google's Enterprise and founder of security firm
Postini, explained to attendees at the RSA conference how the company handles
constant pressure and scrutiny from attackers.
"Google is a very very high-value target," Petry noted.
"If you have bad intentions and want to get a reputation, hacking Google is
the best way to get credibility on the streets."
In order to keep its products safe, Google has adopted a philosophy of
'security as a cultural value'. The programme includes mandatory security
training for developers, a set of in-house security libraries, and code reviews
both by Google developers and outside security researchers.
"The most important thing that our security team does is educate," Petry
explained.
"Educating people is the most important thing a security professional can do.
"
Petry contended that in an age where both users and companies are
increasingly relying on outside services and applications, it is becoming nearly
impossible to fully lock-down a company.
"IT is largely fighting yesterday's battle," he said, in reference to the
policy of trying to restrict all user access.
"Start saying okay, if these things are going to happen, do an assessment to
try and bound the risk."
Petry noted that in addition to educating its employees, the company also
implements software 'guard rails', which warn users when potentially risky
actions are taken and later logs them for administrators to archive.
For software developers, Petry also suggested taking a 'neighbourhood watch',
approach to vulnerability disclosure. For Google, this means sharing more
information with researchers and trusting them to do the right thing with their
discoveries.
"If you find a vulnerability, we ask that you share it with us. If you share
it with us, we will respond to you with a time we will fix that hole,"
explained Petry.
"If we do so, that is our responsible response, please don't disclose [the
vulnerability]."
That philosophy, combined with a policy of crediting all researchers who
report flaws, has been very successful for Google, said Petry.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article