HP has reached a
settlement with
The
New York Times and three
BusinessWeek
reporters who had accused the company of spying.
The settlement was not the result of a lawsuit and came after private
negotiations between HP and BusinessWeek's Ben Elgin, Peter Burrows and Roger
Crockett, as well as New York Times reporter John Markoff. Financial
terms were not disclosed.
HP had already paid the
California
Attorney General's office $14.5m to
settle its legal
case over the
spying charges.
The scandal erupted in September 2006 after an internal HP investigation
found
evidence of
misconduct by private investigators and company employees over attempts to
identify the source of a boardroom leak.
It was later revealed that the operation, dubbed Kona II, included lying to
phone companies in order to obtain private phone records, and equipping email
messages with spyware to report forwarding.
The Kona II investigators were also alleged to have discussed placing
surveillance equipment and informants in two national newsrooms.
What HP did was an affront to the free press
Terry Gross Lawyer, Gross & Belsky
"What HP did was an affront to the free press,"
Terry
Gross, the San Francisco lawyer representing the parties told The New
York Times.
"They did not like what reporters were writing, and they broke into their
private telephone accounts to identify who their sources were."
HP said in a written statement that it is "happy to resolve the matter". But
the company still faces lawsuits filed by three
CNET reporters
and one of their family members, as well as a journalist working for
Associated
Press.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article