The Domain Name System (DNS) is still growing strongly, indicating the
internet's expansion in terms of infrastructure, users, traffic and
applications.
But the annual survey of domain name servers on the public internet by
Infoblox
suggests that the global DNS is as vulnerable as ever.
DNS servers map domain names to their specific IP address, directing internet
inquiries to the appropriate location.
Domain name resolution conducted by these servers is required to perform any
internet-related request.
Should an organisation's DNS systems fail, all internet functions, including
email, web access, e-commerce and extranets, become unavailable.
The report showed that the DNS infrastructure is modernising and coalescing
around the most recent versions of the
Berkeley
Internet Name Domain (Bind), the most commonly used DNS server software on
the internet.
However, the DNS is still vulnerable as many DNS servers are left open to
attack from several directions.
More than 50 per cent of internet name servers allow recursive queries, for
example, which often require a name server to relay requests to other name
servers.
This can leave name servers vulnerable to pharming attacks and allow those
servers to be used in DNS amplification attacks that can take down important
internet infrastructure.
"For the overall security of the internet, it is good to see movement away
from Microsoft DNS Servers for external DNS as well as a growing trend to use
the most recent versions of Bind," said Cricket Liu, vice president of
architecture at Infoblox.
"However, even with growing adoption of more secure name servers, compromises
of these systems are still occurring.
"Organisations need to pay more attention to configurations and deployment
architectures that are leaving their DNS infrastructures vulnerable to attacks
and outages."
Infoblox reported that internet-facing DNS servers increased to 11.5 million,
up from around nine million in 2006 and 7.5 million in 2005, and that use of
Bind 9, the latest version, grew to 65 per cent in 2007, up from 61 per cent in
2006.
Furthermore, support for the Sender Policy Framework increased to 12.6 per
cent in 2007, up from five per cent in 2006.
SPF allows software to identify and reject forged email addresses and
indicates that organisations are taking email fraud seriously.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article