Tim O'Reilly, the father of the term 'web 2.0', has denounced
Google's
OpenSocial as
"boring" and a "full blown disappointment".
OpenSocial offers a standard for applications on social networks that allow
developers to market applications on any network supporting the standard. Early
supporters include
Plaxo,
LinkedIn,
MySpace
and Google's
Orkut.
The standard does not unlock data from the participating network, however,
which might have allowed a MySpace user to exchange messages with a LinkedIn
user, for example.
The service also will not allow the use of social search engines that let
users locate friends across all networks.
In a posting on a
company
blog, O'Reilly described the lack of data sharing as a "fundamental failure
" to understand two key principles of web 2.0: open data and loosely coupled
applications or services.
"If all OpenSocial does is allow developers to port their applications more
easily from one social network to another, that's a big win for the developer as
they get to shop their application to users of every participating social
network," wrote O'Reilly.
"But it provides little incremental value to the user [who is] the real
target. We do not want to have the same application on multiple social networks.
We want applications that can use data from multiple social networks."
O'Reilly heads up
O'Reilly
Media, a well known publisher of books for developers. He is also credited
with coining the term 'web 2.0'.
Originally used during a conference on new media in 2004, the term is used
and abused by online services such as mashups and
Digg.
O'Reilly pointed out that
Google
Maps has been a token example of web 2.0 because it allowed developers to
embed the maps on their own website and combine them with data from outside
sources.
If Google had taken the OpenSocial approach with Google Maps, it would have
created a service that allowed developers to create mapping applications across
Microsoft,
Yahoo and
Google. O'Reilly summarised such a service as "boring".
A reader commenting on O'Reilly's rant pointed out that Google plans to
release an addition to the service dubbed the People Data API, although it is
not clear exactly what the API would enable.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article