A Brussels think-tank has accused the US government of reneging on
commitments made to the
World
Trade Organisation (WTO) over internet gaming.
Panellists at a trade forum levelled harsh criticism at the US, focusing on a
burgeoning trade clash between the US and Europe over internet gaming.
The forum believes that the US could be liable for up to $100bn in trade
concessions to European industries after placing illegal discriminatory trade
restrictions on European gaming operators.
The disputed concessions arise from Antigua's victory earlier this year when
the WTO ruled that the US violated its treaty obligations by excluding online
Antiguan gaming operators, while allowing domestic operators to offer various
forms of online gaming.
Instead of complying with the ruling, the Bush administration withdrew the
sizeable gambling industry from its free trade commitments.
As a result, all 151 WTO members are considering seeking compensation for the
withdrawal equal to the size of the entire US land-based and online gaming
market, estimated at nearly $100bn.
The
European
Union, along with India and five other countries, has filed notice that it
intends to seek compensation.
"The US decision is a major threat to a rules-based international trading
system," said Nao Matsukata, former director of policy planning for the Office
of the US Trade Representative.
"If more countries follow the US lead and do the same thing, the entire WTO
system could implode and that would be extremely dangerous for US economic
interests and for free trade generally.
"Part of what makes the US such a formidable opponent in international
negotiations is its credibility. That credibility is now at stake for the US
government not just in the trade area but in foreign relations generally."
Lode Van Den Hende, a trade lawyer at
Herbert
Smith in Brussels, criticised the US for prosecuting foreign online gaming
companies while letting domestic online gaming interests operate with impunity.
"This is absolute discrimination against foreign operators that the WTO has
found to be illegal," he said.
"It is exactly the kind of practice that the WTO was set up to eliminate, and
now the US is violating this very basic principle that it fought hard to put in
place at the inception of the organisation."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article