Organisational issues within large IT departments are the major factor
holding back virtualisation, according to
VMware
chief executive Diane Greene.
Virtualisation spans areas such as storage, servers and network security,
often requiring cooperation between several groups within a company.
"[Organisational silos are] one of the things that holds back virtualisation
deployments because the different groups have to agree about procedures and
impact," Greene told
vnunet.com
in an interview at the
VMworld
2007 conference in San Francisco.
"You want to start shifting to an organisation where a certain group does the
hardware and a certain group does the infrastructure and then a different group
does the business applications.
"The people that do the business applications really do not need to be
concerned with operating systems or the hardware or anything like that."
Large firms typically have an advantage over small businesses, in that they
are often the first to use new technologies because they can afford the required
investment and have the necessary staff.
But these roles are reversed with virtualisation. Small businesses typically
have only one person managing IT, so they are able to deploy virtualisation and
gain the benefits such as increased server consolidation and power savings.
Greene explained that VMware plans to develop additional tools to help firms
set up and manage virtual systems, allowing the technology to span these groups
with a minimal impact on the organisation.
VMware actually derives more revenue from the sale of tools than from its
hypervisor. Such tools assist users in moving virtual workloads to different
servers while running through VMware's Vmotion technology.
The ability to perform so-called live migrations is one of the strengths of
VMware compared with
Microsoft's
Viridian technology, which is slated for availability some time next year.
Microsoft was forced to delay the product earlier this year and had to pull
several features, including a live migration capability and the ability to add
processors and memory to a running machine.
The software giant also scaled back the maximum number of supported
processors from 64 to 16.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article