Electronic Frontier Foundation
The Electronic Frontier Foundation believes that the RIAA's policy towards file-sharing is not working

EFF condemns music download lawsuits

Group says RIAA legal campaign not working

Shaun Nichols in California

The policy of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to sue users caught downloading music illegally has done nothing to slow the trade of copyrighted music on peer-to-peer networks, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

"The lawsuit campaign has enriched only lawyers, rather than compensating artists for file sharing," the EFF declared in a 25-page report (PDF). "One thing has become clear: suing music fans is no answer to the peer-to-peer dilemma."

Advertisement

The EFF claims that traffic on peer-to-peer file-sharing services has ballooned since the RIAA began suing individual users, from 3.3 million monthly users in August 2003 to more than 8.8 million by June 2005.

The recording industry trade group is also singling out a small group of copyright violators and saddling them with unnecessarily steep financial penalties, the EFF lamented.

"There is no question that the RIAA's lawsuit campaign is unfairly singling out a few people for a disproportionate amount of punishment," reads the report.

"Tens of millions of Americans continue to use peer-to-peer file sharing software and other new technologies to share music, yet the RIAA has randomly singled out only a few for retribution through lawsuits."

Instead of pursuing action against individual users, the EFF recommended that the RIAA and its members should adopt policies to bring customers back to purchasing music.

Lowering music prices and abandoning digital rights management technology would provide a far better incentive for users to purchase legitimate copies of music, the group suggested.

"If the recording industry is serious about luring music fans away from peer-to-peer networks and other methods of sharing, it should focus on dangling a tastier carrot, rather than swatting more individuals with the lawsuit stick, " said the report.

The RIAA declined to comment specifically on the EFF report, but denied that its legal campaign has failed to yield any results.

The group contends that, while peer-to-peer sharing has increased, the popularity of paid download services has grown significantly in recent years. Consumers also have a better understanding of the difference between legal and illegal services.

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

Google Chrome

Microsoft has no need to worry about Chrome OS

Redmond may actually welcome the new arrival

Dr Aladdin Ayesh

Is it time for the Turing Test to retire?

It is nearly 60 years since Alan Turing devised a...

Security double standards

Broadband provider Tiscali has launched new figures showing an alarming...

Beach

Top 10 holiday gadgets

A wry look at the must-have beach items for any...

Primary Navigation