Real wins patent victory

Friskit's $70m lawsuit fails

Clement James

RealNetworks, the company behind the digital media player, Real Player, has won a patent infringement lawsuit brought by San Francisco-based technology licensing company, Friskit.

Frisket had been seeking damages of over $70m against Real, but Judge William W. Schwarzer of the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted RealNetworks' motion for summary judgment invalidating the claims of four patents asserted by Friskit.

Advertisement

In its motion, RealNetworks relied upon the recent legal decision in KSR vs Teleflex, in which the Supreme Court ruled on the proper standard for determining obviousness in patent cases.

The Supreme Court rejected any "rigid" application of existing tests for obviousness in favour of the "expansive and flexible approach" set forth in the Supreme Court's earlier decisions. RealNetworks relied upon that analysis to argue that Friskit's patent claims relating to systems for enabling continuous streaming playback from internet sites were "obvious combinations of elements found in the prior art", including RealNetworks' own internet products.

Judge Schwarzer agreed with RealNetworks that "all of the individual features of Friskit's patents which allow the user to easily search for and listen to streaming media existed in the prior art."

He also agreed with RealNetworks that "streaming media, including streaming audio, also existed prior to Friskit's patents," and that "a number of web sites allowed users to locate media to download or stream." After considering the prior art presented by RealNetworks, Judge Schwarzer concluded that "the idea of integrating these different components was not novel."

"We are very pleased with the results of today's ruling," said Robert Kimball, senior vice president and general counsel for RealNetworks.

"Since the legal dispute between the parties commenced over four years ago, Real has vigorously denied Friskit's patent claims and defended our position that we do not infringe its patents.

"While we respect intellectual property rights and the rights of inventors to protect their innovations, we have also made it clear that RealNetworks will not be pressured into taking a license for technology we do not use and patents that we do not infringe despite the cost of fighting in court."

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation