Some laser printers release tiny particles of toner-like material into the
air that people can inhale deep into their lungs where they may pose a health
hazard, scientists have warned.
Lidia Morawska, PhD, and colleagues in Australia classified 17 out of 62
printers in a recent study as “high particle emitters” because they released
relatively high quantities of particles, which the researchers believe to be
toner.
"One of the printers released particles into an experimental chamber at a
rate comparable to the particle emissions from cigarette smoking," the
researchers stated.
Thirty-seven of the 62 printers, on the other hand, released no particles
that diminished air quality. Six released only low levels, and two medium
levels. All printers were monitored in an open office and the researchers
recorded data on three laser printers in an experimental chamber. The study
included popular models in the US and Australia sold internationally under the
Canon, HP Color Laserjet, Ricoh and Toshiba brand names.
Most of the printer-generated particles detected were ultrafine, Morawska
said, explaining that such contaminants are easily inhaled into the smallest
passageways of the lungs where they could pose “a significant health threat”.
“It wasn’t an area we consciously decided to study,” Morawska said in an
interview. “We came across it by chance. Initially we were studying the
efficiency of ventilation systems to protect office settings from outdoor air
pollutants. We soon realised that we were seeing air pollution originating
indoors, from laser printers.”
The study found that indoor particle levels in the office air increased
fivefold during work hours due to printer use. Printers emitted more particles
when operating with new toner cartridges and when printing graphics and images
that require greater quantities of toner.
As a result of the study, the scientists are calling on government officials
to consider regulating emission levels from laser printers. “By all means, this
is an important indoor source of pollution,” Morawska said. “There should be
regulations.”
The research is scheduled for publication in the 1 August online issue of the
American Chemical Society’s Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T).
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article