Signature-based malware detection techniques are becoming less effective in
the face of so-called 'malware 2.0' threats, a security firm claimed today.
"The security space is changing rapidly. We are witnessing a major shift in
the anti-malware marketplace moving into a new era of malware 2.0," said Kurt
Baumgartner, chief threat officer at
PC
Tools.
"We are now dealing with zero-minute, rather than just zero-day, exploits
that have the potential to further evade signature detections."
PC Tools said that malware variants are now released at "immense rates",
driving up sample volumes and making it almost impossible for researchers to
keep on top of updates using manual analysis.
These threats are taking advantage of the non-detection sweet spot where they
can freely propagate and infect before anti-malware companies can respond.
PC Tools argues that new compilers and other techniques are being used to
make threats more difficult, if not impossible, to detect with traditional
signature-based systems.
Rather than the broad sweeping attacks seen in the past, attacks are now
focusing on smaller groups of PCs making it less likely to attract the attention
of security vendors. As a result, malware is spreading in "epic proportions".
"The real challenge for security vendors is in identifying new ways to detect
the behaviour of malware. Signature identification alone is ineffective in
protecting consumers," said Baumgartner.
Fran Howarth, a partner at analyst firm
Hurwitz
and Associates, agreed with the research.
"Signature-based detection is dead, be it for antivirus, intrusion detection
or any other security measures," she told
vnunet.com,
adding that security companies are currently just "playing a constant game of
catch up".
The spyware industry is worth billions of dollars, and there are significant
incentives for malware authors to develop techniques to avoid detection.
The researchers estimate that one in five users with major antivirus products
already installed on their computers are still vulnerable to these new and
emerging threats.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article