Google
has lost the right to the
Gmail name in
Germany following a court ruling over the trademarked
G-Mail
name.
The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court ruled that Google's use of 'Gmail' in the
region breached the 'G-Mail' trademark owned by local businessman Daniel
Giersch.
"In doing so, Google infringed [Giersch's] trademark that had been previously
been registered," said the judgement.
Sebastian Eble, Giersch's lawyer, said that the ruling was a victory for the
many "Davids fighting Googliaths", as the multi-billion dollar company would not
be allowed to continue the case in Germany.
"As far as the Hanseatic Higher Court is concerned, the legal situation is
unambiguous to the extent that it has not allowed an appeal to the Federal Court
of Justice," said Eble.
Arnd Haller, Google's senior legal counsel, said that the company regretted
the German court's decision, but claimed that it would not affect Google's
ability to provide web email to German users.
"Google owns the Gmail trademark in over 60 countries worldwide and we have
used it ever since we launched the service in 2004," he said.
"Our German users will continue to use 'Google Mail' and enjoy the same
experience as users of Gmail worldwide."
Giersch said that he secured the G-Mail name in 2000, four years before
Google, but denied Google's claims that he only registered it to gain
financially by selling it on.
"I have made it clear since the beginning that I will never sell the name,"
Giersch said. "It is my sole intention to realise my idea for a hybrid mail
system and I am absolutely convinced of its success. Neither G-Mail nor myself
are for sale."
The trademark ruling has taken three years, as the case moved through
different courts and various regions in Germany.
In addition to the lawsuit in Germany, Google is also taking action against
Giersch in Spain, Portugal and Switzerland.
The G-Mail trademark has already been upheld in action through the Austrian
courts. Giersch said that each individual court process has required five-figure
amounts to fight.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article