The Enterprise Mobile Strategies report from network consulting firm
BRC compared the
enterprise capabilities of technologies such as Linux, BlackBerry, Symbian and
Windows Mobile, and the offerings of major players such as
Orange and
Verizon.
Advertisement
BRC concluded that, as enterprise mobile computing evolves to combine more
personal computer capabilities on mobile handsets, a critical factor will be the
number of tools available for extending corporate applications to mobiles.
Comprehensive packages are already available to access
Lotus, various
SAP offerings,
Oracle CRM
and
Microsoft
Office using Windows Mobile.
This will encourage large corporations to go Microsoft for mobile, according
to the report, while the proprietary nature of RIM's BlackBerry operating system
will inhibit third-party developers.
Similarly, Symbian's software development kits are device dependent, thereby
fragmenting application markets. Since new applications cannot readily run on
Symbian devices, developers will be more attracted to Windows Mobile.
"RIM and Symbian have attracted millions of business users through personal
information managers and email, but without middleware solutions they will lose
them to Microsoft," said Jeff Ace, one of the report's authors.
"Developers look to the easiest system to place their wares. Windows Mobile
is well marketed, targets the most lucrative market and hides the complexity of
devices from users.
"Nokia has the marketing clout to attract developers, but seems reticent,
while the natural attraction of Windows Mobile must be troubling device
manufacturers."
The report maintained that to counter this challenge and stop more revenue
share going to Microsoft, RIM will need a comprehensive toolset for accessing
corporate middleware and Symbian should move to a device-independent development
platform to attract innovative developers.
RIM announced last month that it will expand support for Windows Mobile-based
devices with a new 'Virtual BlackBerry' software application suite.
The software will enable devices from third-party manufacturers to use
BlackBerry software applications and services.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article