A debate on the future of network security has highlighted sharp divisions
among delegates at
Infosecurity
Europe 2007 on the future of the secure network.
Opinion was divided on the impossibility of a secure network and the need to
protect data, contrasted by those who felt that network security was achievable
within certain parameters.
Advertisement
John Reece, chief executive of John C Reese Associates, said that network
security was perfectly possible and that he had been one of the chief architects
of the first global secure payments network built by
American
Express.
But Reece warned that a new approach is needed in light of the changing
nature of security attacks.
"Security used to be a technical thing but now it is about doing business,
and to do that you need networks," he said.
"That requires trust to be key. So in the future we will see stakeholders
coming into your network as a trusted network, guaranteeing security."
But this view was sharply criticised by Stuart Okin, senior executive at
Accenture.
"The trusted network does not work," he said.
"It is all about securing data. That is why network security is dead, and we
need to concentrate on securing data instead."
To prove his point Okin asked the packed auditorium how many of them felt
that their network is secure. One person raised their hand, a result which Okin
said he had seen mirrored at other meetings.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article