Icann
Icann claims that the internet withstood a major attack because of the Anycast shield technology

Icann shield beats DNS hackers

February attack beaten by Anycast system installed in 2002

Clement James

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) has released a report on the well publicised attack on the internet's backbone of DNS servers early in February.

The report indicates that the internet withstood the attack because of the Anycast shield technology implemented after the last attack of a significant size in 2002.

Advertisement

The 13 core DNS servers of the internet were hit with a significant distributed denial of service attack in early February originating from the Asia-Pacific region.

Six of the 13 root servers that form the foundation of the internet were affected. The two worst affected did not have Anycast installed, Icann said, highlighting the effectiveness of the load balancing technology.

"Even though it was a large attack, the new technology, combined with the speed, skills and experience learned by root server operators over the years, helped to make sure that actual internet users were not inconvenienced," Icann said.

Anycast allows a number of servers in different places to act as if they are in the same location.

While there are 13 locations on the network for root servers, the reality on the ground is that not only are there often dozens at one spot but dozens of servers in other locations that can also deal with requests.

In the case of the F-root, for example, there are no fewer than 42 different locations supporting the root server.

Following the start of the attack in February, engineers soon discovered that all the attack packets were larger than 512-bytes and were able simply to block any packets larger than this size.

With the Anycast technology apparently proven, it is likely that the remaining D, E, G, H and L roots will move over soon, Icann said.

Interestingly, while the motive for the attack remains largely unknown, Icann suggested that it could have been an advertisement for a particular botnet, demonstrating how much power it had at its disposal.

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation