The IT skills examination and training sector is facing a damaging split that
will create confusion for technology professionals and their employers, industry
experts warned today.
The problem stems from the appointment of the
APM
Group in July as the new accreditation body for IT Infrastructure Library
(ITIL) examination and training.
Analyst firm
Gartner
predicts that this will result in two competing computing training programmes
after June 2007.
The protracted negotiations between APM Group and
BCS-ISEB
and EXIN,
the two examining institutes prior to the appointment of APM Group, highlight
the tensions which the new appointment has created.
Gartner warned that there is "little chance of any resolution at all", and
certainly not by January 2007 when the contract takes effect.
As a result, APM Group is under significant pressure and is unlikely to have
a scheme in place that meets the full demand for ITIL training in January.
However Gartner advises enterprises that this will not create significant
problems in the short term because training will be available from BCS-ISEB and
EXIN until June 2007.
Simon Mingay, research vice president for IT management strategies at
Gartner, said: "The appointment of APM Group has created a division in the IT
service management community, with APM Group on one side, the original
examination institutes on the other, and the community split between the two
camps.
"Their positions have progressively become more entrenched during the past
two months, culminating in a press release on 13 November in which EXIN and
BCS-ISEB announced their alliance in a signed memorandum of understanding.
"This will effectively create a parallel qualification scheme in competition
with the official ITIL-branded APM Group scheme and marks the end of effective
negotiations between APMG and EXIN/BCS-ISEB."
The key sticking point relates to the fear that there will be a reduction in
the credibility and trust in the ITIL qualifications under the scheme that the
APM Group proposes.
Mingay said it is difficult to assess this claim at this stage, but stressed
that it is important for IT organisations to be aware that they will be faced
with two competing training schemes and to "watch this space" closely for
development.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article