Security experts at the
Sans
Institute warned last week of a major surge in zero-day flaws as part of its
2006 update to the
Top
20 Internet Security Attack Targets list.
The report advises implementation of a "least privilege" environment to
reduce the impact of such attacks.
Marco Peretti, chief technical officer at security firm
BeyondTrust,
agreed with the findings of the Sans Institute, urging users to follow the "
principle of least privilege" in setting user access controls, permissions and
rights.
Peretti also suggested restricting or limiting the use of active code such as
JavaScript or ActiveX in browsers.
Companies using
Microsoft's
Active
Directory should take maximum advantage of Group Policy Objects to control
user access, and should not rely on antivirus protection alone since zero-day
attacks are often not detectable until new signatures are released.
"A zero-day vulnerability is a known flaw in software that does not have a
patch available," said Marc Sachs, director of the
Sans
Internet Storm Center.
"In 2006 we have seen a significant rise in attacks that take advantage of
zero-day vulnerabilities, leaving a user or system unable to defend against the
attack since no patch is available."
This type of application-level attack is very hard to prevent with
traditional flow-based schemes such as intrusion detection systems and
firewalls.
Likewise, consumer-oriented security solutions such as antivirus software
cannot usually detect the initial outbreak of a zero-day exploit attack.
"When users and applications are given more privileges than necessary,
organisations expose themselves to threats such as malware and data theft no
matter what defence they have in place," warned Peretti.
"A huge security problem that Windows enterprises face is that many users
must be given administrative privileges in order to run required applications.
"However, as we have seen, administrative privileges are easily exploited by
zero-day threats and malicious users. So you have to ask yourself if you trust
your existing security defences."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article