A security firm has criticised the UK courts for inconsistent sentencing of
cyber-criminals after a
Fathers
4 Justice campaigner who admitted hacking a website and distributing viruses
was spared a jail sentence.
Matthew Byrne, 38, from Nottinghamshire, has been given an eight-month
sentence, suspended for two years, after pleading guilty to writing the Mirsa-A
and Mirsa-B viruses which posed as messages from the Fathers 4 Justice campaign
group.
Advertisement
He also admitted hacking into accounts belonging to users of dating website
Loveandfriends.com.
"The
Computer
Crime Unit at Scotland Yard should be congratulated for bringing another
hacker to justice, but we must question whether the legal system is dealing with
virus writers in a consistent fashion," said Graham Cluley, senior technology
consultant at
Sophos.
"In 2003, 21 year-old Welsh virus writer Simon Vallor received a two-year
jail sentence from the same judge, and more recently the British government has
approved the extradition to the US of alleged Nasa hacker
Gary
McKinnon.
"Is there a danger that conflicting messages are being sent to the hacking
community by allowing Byrne to escape jail?"
Byrne left a clue buried inside the W32/Mirsa-A virus stating that 'Sheffield
Hallam university is corrupt'.
"It was a stupid message for Byrne to include inside his worm. Sure enough,
at the time of his arrest, he was living in Sheffield," said Cluley.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article