Tiscali
has hit back at allegations by the
British
Phonographic Industry (BPI) that 17 of its broadband customers are
sharing
files illegally.
The ISP complained about the way the issue was raised in the press, and
insisted that the BPI had only provided evidence for one of the 17 IP addresses.
Tiscali claimed that it routinely cooperates with the music industry and does
not condone illegal file sharing or any other abuse of its service.
However, Tiscali maintained that the press release put out by the BPI was not
the way to resolve the issue.
"As you will already be fully aware, Tiscali will not be able to disclose
customer details to you unless you obtain a court order requiring us to do so,"
Tiscali's letter to the BPI said.
"To disclose without a court order would put Tiscali at risk of breaching the
terms and conditions of its customer agreements, and the provisions of the
Data
Protection Act 1998."
Tiscali stated that any legal implications of its investigations would need
to be handled by the BPI when it had obtained those customer details through the
proper channels.
"It is a matter for [our customers] to decide whether they wish to enter into
such undertakings or defend proceedings against them in the courts," the letter
said.
"It is not for Tiscali, as an ISP, nor the BPI, as a trade association, to
effectively act as a regulator or law enforcement agency and deny individuals
the right to defend themselves against the allegations made against them."
Tiscali said that the BPI had provided a list of 17 IP addresses with dates
and times of use and a list of sound recordings, including screenshots of the
shared drive of one customer.
"You state that such evidence is 'overwhelming'. However, you have provided
no actual evidence in respect of 16 of the accounts," said Tiscali's letter to
the BPI.
"Further, you have provided no evidence of downloading taking place nor have
you provided evidence that the shared drive was connected by the relevant IP
address at the relevant time."
Tiscali said that it had contacted the customer about whom the BPI had
provided 'evidence' and given that person seven days to provide an explanation.
"Should we not receive an adequate explanation during such period, we shall
suspend the user's account pending resolution of your investigation, assuming by
that time we have received evidence from you of a link between the user account
and the IP address at the relevant time," stated the ISP.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article