F-Secure has backtracked on a statement it made at the Infosecurity show
F-Secure has backtracked on a statement about a mobile virus

F-Secure backtracks on mobile 'virus'

Security firm caught on tape

Matt Chapman

F-Secure has backtracked on a statement it made at the Infosecurity show, where the company reported a mobile "virus" that was charging users $5 to send premium SMS messages. 

The company originally told vnunet.com that the virus, which was much like the Commwarrior Bluetooth worm, was now affecting mobile phone users. 

Advertisement

However, F-Secure yesterday denied the story in a blog posting, following a number of enquiries it received from other journalists.

"Apparently the reporter misunderstood a quite harmless Java Trojan as a dangerous Bluetooth worm that is spreading in the wild. It seems that the reporter got mixed up with Redbrowser and Commwarrior," a post by Jarno Niemela said on the company's blog.

Unfortunately for F-Secure, vnunet.com had recorded the interview (1.87MB) with Richard Hales, F-Secure's country manager for UK and Ireland, in which he clearly talks about the new threat.

"It's people doing it to prove they can at the moment," Hales says, following a discussion of the Commwarrior and Skulls viruses.

"Although again I saw an email in the last few days where somebody is now making money from it. Somebody has launched something that gets your phone to send an SMS to a premium rate service.

"So the virus sends authority that it can charge you," Hales says, clearly stating that this is a virus.

When F-Secure was confronted with this information, vnunet.com received an apologetic phone call from Hales, who admitted that he got it wrong.

Hales agreed to contact Niemela and get him to change his posting on the F-Secure blog.

However, when the blog was eventually updated, F-Secure still suggested that it was vnunet.com which got the story wrong.

Hales has now formally apologised to vnunet.com in an emailed statement. "I'm really sorry about what happened," he wrote.

"I don't write the blog so this can be considered accurate as straight from the technical folks who work with the malware that we see. I'm sorry that the first entry suggested it was mis-reporting by you when in fact I made a mistake. "

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

Xperia X1

Video Review: Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

First Looks Editor Ian Williams gets hands on with the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Poll: Summer smartphones

Poll: Summer smartphones

Which smartphone will you be taking to the beach this summer?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

a padlock

Microsoft to plug security holes

Microsoft has given advance warning of a number of security...

Nokia handset

Top 10 articles, 10 July 09

No Nokia Android phone, ActiveX attacks and Google enters into...

Can Google beat Microsoft at its own game?

Google's announcement this week that it plans to step into...

iPhone

Video Review: iPhone 3GS

We put Apple's latest iPhone through its paces

Primary Navigation