A US legal amendment has made it an offence to annoy anyone anonymously over the internet.
President Bush signed the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, which includes a clause on 'cyber-stalking'.
A US legal amendment has made it an offence to annoy anyone anonymously over the internet.
President Bush signed the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, which includes a clause on 'cyber-stalking'.
This amends existing telephone harassment laws and extends them to the internet, providing a maximum two-year jail sentence for anyone using use the web "without disclosing [their] identity and with intent to annoy".
Civil liberties groups have vowed to fight the legislation in the courts under the First Amendment, claiming that it would make it impossible for whistleblowers to operate without putting themselves at risk.
Clinton Fein, a South African activist who runs Annoy.com, was scathing about the new law.
"It appears that one is guilty of a crime if one were simply to 'utilise' a telecoms device 'with intent to annoy' a person regardless of the content or even in its absence," he said. "A conduct rather than a content crime; perhaps waving a BlackBerry in someone's face."
New survey suggests a fall in the 'annoyance' factor

In part one of V3.co.uk's interview with Dirk Singer, he dicusses social media monitoring strategies

Remote access - Three steps to getting connected
3.4 million UK professionals now work from home – is your company equipped?

Cost benefits of a global collaboration network
This white paper is a must read for organisations looking for evidence of the bottom-line benefits of high-definition video and voice communications
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies; IThound.com brings you over 6,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.

Join our live chat session on Thursday at 11am to...

Researchers from security firm FireEye have been able to effectively...
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article