Microsoft today
released the findings of an
independent
report claiming that the Windows platform is "more consistent, predictable
and easier to manage than Linux".
The study, commissioned by the software giant from
Security
Innovation, a provider of application security services, claimed that Linux
administrators took 68 per cent longer to implement new business requirements
than their Windows counterparts.
Advertisement
"As they attempt to increase business capabilities over time, customers are
telling us that they are hitting a wall with Linux, experiencing significant
reliability issues resulting in higher total cost of ownership," said Martin
Taylor, general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft.
"This study shows that IT administrators are better able to maintain the
system while delivering new capabilities predictably and consistently on the
Windows platform.
"We invite other vendors, including
Novell,
IBM and
Red Hat, to repeat their
own independent analysis based on Security Innovation's methodology."
Security Innovation said that its study of the manageability differences
between Windows and Linux attempted to simulate a "real-world" enterprise
e-commerce environment over the course of a year.
According to the study the Windows platform was "more reliable as enterprise
needs change over time". The Novell SLES solution experienced 14 critical
breakages, while the Windows Server system experienced none, the report claimed.
Security Innovation also claimed that the Novell SLES infrastructure required
4.79 times the number of patches.
"Our research indicates that the primary methods of computing reliability as
indicators of real IT pain are overly simplistic," said Herbert H. Thompson,
chief security strategist at Security Innovation.
"For example, kernel uptime is commonly cited as a metric of overall platform
reliability. However, the reliability of a single component, even one so central
as the operating system kernel, is rarely the largest source of pain.
"Security Innovation designed this study to be repeatable, and we believe
that the results are consistent with what customers are experiencing in the real
world."
A PDF of the Security Innovation report is available
here.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article