The dispute relates to Site Finder, a service VeriSign created in late 2003
for guiding internet users who mistype web addresses.
Advertisement
Critics said that the service interfered with spam filters and other key
internet tools, and said it gave VeriSign an unfair competitive advantage in
search.
VeriSign had the ability to offer the service partly because it controls the
computers that contain the master list of domain name suffixes.
It also runs the core directories responsible for routing email, web and
other traffic for the two most popular suffixes, .com and .net.
VeriSign sued Icann claiming that it had impeded VeriSign's efforts to offer
moneymaking services.
Icann is now sending the proposed settlement to the internet community for
public comment. It includes revising the definition of 'registry service' so
that Site Finder is clearly covered and thus requires prior Icann approval.
The proposed settlement also establishes a formal review process for services
such as Site Finder, and gives Icann 90 days to address any security, stability
and competitive concerns.
Full agreement is a cumbersome process. It needs approval from the board of
both Icann and VeriSign along with the
Commerce Department, which
oversees Icann.
Icann said in a statement that the settlement is "intended to balance
innovation and business certainty with the need to ensure competition, security
and stability in the domain name system".
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article