Microsoft claims Windows more secure than Linux

And SP2 makes XP '15 times more secure'

Robert Jaques

Microsoft has claimed that open source database products and servers such as Linux have had a "significantly greater number and severity of vulnerabilities compared with Windows Server 2003 and SQL Server 2000".

Speaking at the Redmond giant's October 2003 Partner Conference, Mike Nash, corporate vice president of the Security Business and Technology Unit at Microsoft, attempted to justify the controversial claim by citing a report, Role Comparison Security Report: Database Server Role.

Advertisement

The report was commissioned by Microsoft from Security Innovation and was published on 6 June 2005.

"Customers should evaluate the disciplined development process that comes with Microsoft products against open source, which has no similar process," said Nash.

"That, coupled with our clearly defined commitment to managing security issues, is a compelling differentiator for Microsoft against other platforms on security."

In addition Windows XP customers without Service Pack 2 (SP2) are up to 15 times more likely to fall victim to viruses, the software giant has warned.

Nash claimed "measurable improvements" in the security of Windows XP SP2 over older versions of the operating system.

Windows XP SP2 has one-half the number of critical vulnerabilities compared with XP, XP SP1 and Windows 2000 Professional in the first nine months since XP SP2's release in August 2004, according to data presented by Nash.

In addition, customers using XP SP2 are 13 to 15 times less likely to be infected by some of the most prevalent malicious software relative to customers using earlier versions of XP, according to internal Microsoft analysis.

To date, Microsoft has distributed more than 218 million copies of the service pack. The firm said it has also distributed two million copies of Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, which offers similar security improvements, since its release in March 2005.

Nash explained that Microsoft has implemented a rigorous process known as the Security Development Lifecycle to train employees on the development of more secure code, and to test and review products for security quality.

  • Have your say
  • Send to a friend
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Share

Tags:

Do you agree?

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Most watched

eu flag

V3.co.uk weekly debrief, 6 Nov 09

This week, Europe decides what to do with illegal file sharers

Intel unveils its micro server platform

Small-enclosure systems take aim at hosting market

IT white papers

Search white papers

Top categories

Poll

Impact of Information Overload poll

Impact of Information Overload poll

What is the biggest problem your firm faces as a result of the data explosion?

View poll results

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Spotlight

eu flag

V3.co.uk weekly debrief, 6 Nov 09

This week, Europe decides what to do with illegal file...

Dell Adamo XPS

Dell launches ultra-thin Adamo XPS

World's thinnest laptop will be available by Christmas

Top 10 articles, 6 November 2009

The worst Microsoft products of all time, and a USB...

Iain Thomson

Pirate Bay shutdown could be inspiring online militancy

Recent Swedish attacks raise worrying possibility

Primary Navigation